This objection Homosexual not normal commonly raised in Homosexual not normal of homosexuality. Of course, what Homosexual not normal normal is rarely ever defined but instead, is bantered about and offered as a reason for justifying homosexual activity. See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian.
So, in that sense, homosexuality is not normal. If homosexuality is considered normal because it occasionally occurs in the animal kingdom, then this does not support it being normal since it is practiced by a small percent of animal populations which is below the norm.
If, however, an appeal is made to the fact that Homosexual not normal occurs within animals regardless of the percentage of the occurrence, then this has problems because it implies that
Homosexual not normal occurs in the animal kingdom is normal for us.
Then wouldn't Homosexual not normal mean that it is normal to eat your young, to eat other creatures alive, to lie in wait to ambush and kill, sniff other human being's rear ends, eat placentas, barf up food to give to your young, and eat your own feces? But, since people will differentiate between a sexual conduct and eating poop, they
Homosexual not Homosexual not normal the it-is-done-in-the-animal-kingdom standard of morality to themselves in a selective fashion--particularly when it centers around their fleshly desires.
What about it being Homosexual not normal regarding evolutionary theory?
If evolution is how humankind got here, then how did the tendency for homosexuality survive genetically since it does not offspring? It Homosexual not normal seem that what is normal, evolutionarily speaking, would be that which produces offspring--not that which does not. After all, haven't we evolved over millions of years and billions of generations of life forms such that genes that produce survivability are removed from the population?
So, from this perspective how could homosexuality be considered normal? In fact, evolutionarily speaking, homosexuality would be abnormal; and it would have to be a learned behavior. So, whenever anyone says that homosexuality is normal, it becomes obvious that Homosexual not normal standard of normality either doesn't exist or when they try to cite one that it works against Is homosexuality a normal practice?
I Homosexual not normal don't see how it could be. Homosexuality is normal so it should not be considered wrong by Matt Slick This objection is commonly raised in support of homosexuality. First of all, "normal" is defined as. Biological Normality If homosexuality is considered normal because it occasionally occurs in the animal kingdom, then this does not support it being normal since it is practiced by a small percent of animal populations which is below the norm.
Evolution What about it being normal regarding evolutionary theory? Related Articles
Homosexual not normal write about homosexuality?
Does Romans 1 condemn homosexuality?
The word "homosexual" didn't appear in English Bibles until Homosexual behavior doesn't harm anyone. Being born gay is like being born into a race. Home What's New and